Close Menu
All Hail Trump
  • Home
  • Donald Trump
  • Hub
  • Latest News
  • Life
  • More Today
  • Policies
  • Today’s latest
    • Top Stories & Analysis
  • Politics

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Donald Trump Suffers Legal Loss Over Billions of FEMA Funds

August 8, 2025

Toyota reports a 37% drop in profit, cuts its forecast due to Trump’s tariffs

August 8, 2025

China Weighs In on Gaza War

August 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
All Hail TrumpAll Hail Trump
  • Home
  • Donald Trump
  • Hub
  • Latest News
  • Life
  • More Today
  • Policies
  • Today’s latest
    • Top Stories & Analysis
  • Politics
All Hail Trump
Home»Policies»Trump urges Supreme Court to let him fire members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission
Policies

Trump urges Supreme Court to let him fire members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission

Robert JonesBy Robert JonesJuly 3, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



CNN
 — 

President Donald Trump’s administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to step in on an emergency basis to permit the firing of three members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, as the White House continues to attempt to assert more control over independent agencies.

Trump dismissed the three Joe Biden-appointees in May, but a federal district court last month ordered their reinstatement. The administration is asking the Supreme Court to pause the lower court order, a move that would take the three commissioners off the board again.

The appeal is the latest to reach the high court dealing with the administration’s power to fire board members at agencies Congress set up to have independence from the whims of the White House. The court has been receptive to Trump’s arguments in earlier cases, giving his administration more control over those agencies – at least in the short term.

The litigation around the Consumer Product Safety Commission, has “thrown the agency into chaos,” the Trump administration told the Supreme Court and has “put agency staff in the untenable position of deciding which commissioners’ directives to follow.”

The agency is charged with protecting consumers from dangerous products by issuing recalls and taking other enforcement steps.

Trump has had considerable success with similar claims over independent agencies at the Supreme Court. In May, the court, in an unsigned opinion, allowed Trump to fire officials at two independent federal labor agencies that enforce worker protections. The Department of Justice heavily cited that outcome in its appeal to the high court Wednesday.

“Because the Constitution vests the executive power in the president,” the court wrote in its opinion at the time, “he may remove without cause executive officers who exercise that power on his behalf, subject to narrow exceptions recognized by our precedents.”

Writing for the dissenting justices, Justice Elena Kagan said the majority had effectively overruled a decades-old Supreme Court case, Humphrey’s Executor v. US, that allowed Congress to require presidents to show cause – such as malfeasance – before dismissing board members overseeing independent agencies.

In the Consumer Product Safety Commission case now pending, the Richmond-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected Trump’s appeal – despite the outcome in the earlier case. In a concurring opinion, US Circuit Judge James Wynn noted that the Supreme Court had not yet technically overturned Humphrey’s Executor.

“That precedent remains binding on this court unless and until the Supreme Court overrules it,” wrote Wynn, who was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama.

In its filing Wednesday, the Trump administration urged the Supreme Court to issue an immediate “administrative stay” that would let Trump keep the members off the board for a few days while the court considers the case. The board members fired back rapidly with a brief Wednesday rejecting the need for that outcome.

Because the board members are “currently serving and have been since June 13,” they told the court, “an administrative stay would disrupt the status quo.”



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Robert Jones

Related Posts

Trump nominates Stephen Miran to fill vacancy at the Fed

August 7, 2025

Trump remade the global trading system. He’s just getting started

August 7, 2025

5 things to know for August 7: Tariffs, Fort Stewart shooting, ICE, DC, Chikungunya virus

August 7, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Donald Trump Suffers Legal Loss Over Billions of FEMA Funds

August 8, 2025

Toyota reports a 37% drop in profit, cuts its forecast due to Trump’s tariffs

August 8, 2025

China Weighs In on Gaza War

August 8, 2025

Trump says he would meet with Putin

August 7, 2025
Don't Miss

Kremlin says Putin-Trump meeting agreed, will happen in ‘coming days’

Donald Trump August 7, 2025

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at a joint press conference after…

Trump vows 100% tariff on chips, unless companies are building in the U.S.

August 6, 2025

Trump’s defense of firing BLS chief relies on twisted timeline

August 6, 2025

5 soldiers shot at military base, Army says

August 6, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 allhailtrump. Designed by allhailtrump.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.