Close Menu
All Hail Trump
  • Home
  • Donald Trump
  • Hub
  • Latest News
  • Life
  • More Today
  • Policies
  • Today’s latest
    • Top Stories & Analysis
  • Politics

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Trump warns of another Great Depression if court strikes down tariffs

August 8, 2025

Ron DeSantis Responds to Judge Ordering Halt to Alligator Alcatraz

August 8, 2025

DOJ opens investigation into New York AG’s office that brought fraud case against Trump

August 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
All Hail TrumpAll Hail Trump
  • Home
  • Donald Trump
  • Hub
  • Latest News
  • Life
  • More Today
  • Policies
  • Today’s latest
    • Top Stories & Analysis
  • Politics
All Hail Trump
Home»Policies»Federal judge indefinitely blocks Trump’s ban on transgender service members, saying it’s ‘soaked in animus’
Policies

Federal judge indefinitely blocks Trump’s ban on transgender service members, saying it’s ‘soaked in animus’

Robert JonesBy Robert JonesMarch 19, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



CNN
 — 

A federal judge has indefinitely blocked President Donald Trump’s ban on transgender service members, dealing a major defeat to a controversial policy the president resurrected from his first term.

In a scathing ruling, US District Judge Ana Reyes said the administration cannot enforce the ban — which was set to take effect later this month.

Reyes, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, wrote that the ban “is soaked in animus and dripping with pretext. Its language is unabashedly demeaning, its policy stigmatizes transgender persons as inherently unfit, and its conclusions bear no relation to fact.”

“Indeed, the cruel irony is that thousands of transgender servicemembers have sacrificed – some risking their lives – to ensure for others the very equal protection rights the Military Ban seeks to deny them,” she wrote.

The judge said she was pausing her preliminary injunction until Friday morning to give the administration time to appeal it to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

The ruling came in a case brought by transgender active-duty service members and others hoping to enlist in the military who would be barred from service under the ban. Reyes said they had shown that they would likely succeed on their claim that the ban violated rights afforded to them by the Constitution.

Days after taking office, Trump signed an executive order directing the Pentagon to implement its own policies that say transgender service members are incompatible with military service. The government had argued that continuing to permit trans individuals to serve in the US would negatively affect, among other things, the military’s lethality, readiness and cohesion.

“Defendants have not provided a legitimate reason for banning all transgender troops,” the judge wrote.

CNN has reached out to the Defense Department for comment.

Justice Department lawyers argued that the president had broad authority to determine who can serve in the military, but Reyes rejected that argument in her ruling, writing: “The President has the power — indeed the obligation — to ensure military readiness.”

“At times, however, leaders have used concern for military readiness to deny marginalized persons,” Reyes continued. “First minorities, then women in combat, then gays filled in that blank. Today, however, our military is stronger and our Nation is safer for the millions of such blanks (and all other persons) who serve.”

During Trump’s first term, a similar ban he issued in 2017 that drew at least four lawsuits arguing the prohibition represented an unconstitutional form of sex discrimination. Federal district courts across the nation temporarily blocked the ban from taking effect. Judges from Washington, DC, to Washington state said that it violated the constitutional rights of transgender people.

The Supreme Court, however, let the ban take effect in 2019, but did not rule on whether it was constitutional before President Joe Biden reversed it in 2021.

This story has been updated with additional details.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Robert Jones

Related Posts

Trump warns of another Great Depression if court strikes down tariffs

August 8, 2025

Trump administration urges Supreme Court to allow divisive ICE patrols in California

August 8, 2025

Tariff rebate checks may sound awesome but they could be ‘quite dangerous’

August 8, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Trump warns of another Great Depression if court strikes down tariffs

August 8, 2025

Ron DeSantis Responds to Judge Ordering Halt to Alligator Alcatraz

August 8, 2025

DOJ opens investigation into New York AG’s office that brought fraud case against Trump

August 8, 2025

Restoring Confederate memorial at Arlington Cemetery to cost $10M

August 8, 2025
Don't Miss

DOJ opens investigation into New York AG’s office that brought fraud case against Trump

Donald Trump August 8, 2025

New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks to members of the media following the third…

Kremlin says Putin-Trump meeting agreed, will happen in ‘coming days’

August 7, 2025

Trump vows 100% tariff on chips, unless companies are building in the U.S.

August 6, 2025

Trump’s defense of firing BLS chief relies on twisted timeline

August 6, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 allhailtrump. Designed by allhailtrump.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.