Close Menu
All Hail Trump
  • Home
  • Donald Trump
  • Hub
  • Latest News
  • Life
  • More Today
  • Policies
  • Today’s latest
    • Top Stories & Analysis
  • Politics

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Donald Trump Issues FBI Warning to Fleeing Texas Democrats

August 8, 2025

What to know about Trump’s newest and most sweeping tariffs

August 8, 2025

Trump News: President Reveals Plans to Meet Putin, Zelensky

August 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
All Hail TrumpAll Hail Trump
  • Home
  • Donald Trump
  • Hub
  • Latest News
  • Life
  • More Today
  • Policies
  • Today’s latest
    • Top Stories & Analysis
  • Politics
All Hail Trump
Home»Policies»After Supreme Court term, Chief Justice Roberts shrugs off ‘venting’ by those who lost
Policies

After Supreme Court term, Chief Justice Roberts shrugs off ‘venting’ by those who lost

Robert JonesBy Robert JonesJune 29, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



CNN
 — 

Speaking a day after the Supreme Court ended its term with a burst of high-profile decisions, Chief Justice John Roberts on Saturday warned “political people” against criticizing judges and shrugged off critics if they are “venting” just because they lost.

Without addressing the court’s blockbuster decisions, including the high-profile ruling limiting the power of courts to act as a check on President Donald Trump, Roberts stressed the importance of an independent judiciary and warned against politicians expressing hostility toward jurists.

“I’ve been compelled over the past few years to make statements about people on one side of the aisle – their views on judges – and on the other side,” Roberts told a conference of judges meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina. “It becomes wrapped up in the political dispute that a judge who’s doing his or her job is part of the problem.”

A few months ago, an audience listening to Roberts’ remarks might have read a subtle message about Trump between those lines. In March, the chief justice issued a striking statement pushing back on White House talking points that increasingly targeted judges – including with threats to impeach those who ruled against Trump.

But more recently, Roberts and his conservative colleagues on the court have given the president far more reasons to celebrate than complain. The most significant example of that landed Friday, when a 6-3 majority backed Trump in his months-long fight over nationwide court orders that have paused many of his controversial executive orders.

The Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on April 25, 2024.

‘A huge decision’: Supreme Court limits ability of judges to stop Trump

‘A huge decision’: Supreme Court limits ability of judges to stop Trump

02:24

Democrats and left-leaning groups decried that ruling on Friday, arguing it kneecapped the ability of courts to stop a president’s policy even if it violates the law.

“The danger, of course, is somebody might pick up on that, and we have had, of course, serious threats of violence and murder of judges just simply for doing their work,” said Roberts, who was speaking to a conference organized by the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals. “I think the political people on both sides of the aisle need to keep that in mind.”

Speaking with Judge Albert Diaz, the chief judge of the 4th Circuit, Roberts recognized that the court had dealt with with six major cases on its final day – more than usual. In addition to the ruling on nationwide injunctions, the court also sided with religious parents who want to opt their children out of reading LGBTQ books in schools and upheld a Texas law that requires age verification for pornographic websites.

“Things were a little crunched toward the end this year,” Roberts said, suggesting the court might “try to space it out a little better next year, I suppose.”

Taking criticism over the court’s opinions, Roberts said, is par for the course. But the chief justice also said that “usually” such criticism has more to do with the fact that a party lost rather than any sense they didn’t get a fair hearing.

“It’s not the judge’s fault that a correct interpretation of the law meant that, no, you don’t get to do this,” Roberts said. “If it’s just venting because you lost, then that’s not terribly helpful.”



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Robert Jones

Related Posts

Trump nominates Stephen Miran to fill vacancy at the Fed

August 7, 2025

Trump remade the global trading system. He’s just getting started

August 7, 2025

5 things to know for August 7: Tariffs, Fort Stewart shooting, ICE, DC, Chikungunya virus

August 7, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Donald Trump Issues FBI Warning to Fleeing Texas Democrats

August 8, 2025

What to know about Trump’s newest and most sweeping tariffs

August 8, 2025

Trump News: President Reveals Plans to Meet Putin, Zelensky

August 8, 2025

How India ended up facing steep US tariffs

August 8, 2025
Don't Miss

Kremlin says Putin-Trump meeting agreed, will happen in ‘coming days’

Donald Trump August 7, 2025

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at a joint press conference after…

Trump vows 100% tariff on chips, unless companies are building in the U.S.

August 6, 2025

Trump’s defense of firing BLS chief relies on twisted timeline

August 6, 2025

5 soldiers shot at military base, Army says

August 6, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 allhailtrump. Designed by allhailtrump.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.